new study shows liberas are less open minded

New study shows liberas are less open minded how to#

Republicans don’t believe in the imagination, partly because so few of them have one, but mostly because it gets in the way of their chosen work, which is to destroy the human race and the planet. You might even go as far as Michael Feingold, a theater critic for the liberal newspaper the Village Voice, when he wrote: If you don’t see that Reagan is pursuing positive values of Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity, you almost have to conclude that Republicans see no positive value in Care and Fairness.

New study shows liberas are less open minded how to#

He’s more interested in fighting wars and telling people how to run their sex lives. When faced with questions such as “One of the worst things a person could do is hurt a defenseless animal” or ”Justice is the most important requirement for a society,” liberals assumed that conservatives would disagree. If you have a moral matrix built primarily on intuitions about care and fairness (as equality), and you listen to the Reagan narrative, what else could you think? Reagan seems completely unconcerned about the welfare of drug addicts, poor people, and gay people. Liberals were the least accurate, especially those who described themselves as “very liberal.” The biggest errors in the whole study came when liberals answered the Care and Fairness questions while pretending to be conservatives. Moderates and conservatives were most accurate in their predictions, whether they were pretending to be liberals or conservatives. More important, it allowed us to assess how accurate they were by comparing people’s expectations about “typical” partisans to the actual responses from partisans on the left and the right)’ Who was best able to pretend to be the other? This design allowed us to examine the stereotypes that each side held about the other. One-third of the time they were asked to fill it out as a “typical conservative” would respond. One-third of the time they were asked to fill it out as they think a “typical liberal” would respond. We asked more than two thousand American visitors to fill out the Moral Foundations Qyestionnaire. One-third of the time they were asked to fill it out normally, answering as themselves. In a study I did with Jesse Graham and Brian Nosek, we tested how well liberals and conservatives could understand each other. Sanctity is religious mumbo-jumbo whose only function is to suppress female sexuality and justify homophobia. Loyalty to a group shrinks the moral circle it is the basis of racism and exclusion, they say. When I speak to liberal audiences about the three “binding” foundations – Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity – I find that many in the audience don’t just fail to resonate they actively reject these concerns as immoral. From page 334 of The Righteous Mind (emphasis added): Haidt describes a study in which he examines how well liberals, conservatives, and moderates understand each other.